The Nature Theater of Oklahoma ([info]nuncstans) wrote,
@ 2008-02-07 16:03:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: gross

Crocspiracy
This may not seem like the most urgent of topics, considering that I never write here anymore and so a more appropriate choice would be I have overturned the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, Here Is My Proof; but there is something else riding the proper balance of frivolous and infuriating, pointless yet provocative, that has been firing up my Reptilian Blog Lobe, and it is, once again, on the subject of shoes.

Like many of you, I used to be sessile. Whenever it was that I first processed that I wasn’t going to be a star athlete, I was like, I dun care that I wasn’ chosen funna team, and my complete lack of enunciation showed how much less I really couldn’t care. But then, jumping over 20 or so years, I became invested in not being in pain all the time. I started doing things so difficult that I thought I might lose my mind. Sitting through yoga classes in which teachers rambled pithily about the “tenants” of their hybrid belief systems and having my personal space invaded by the relaxed errant feet of wearers of tie-dyed lycra —I said tie-dyed lycra— took all my resources. But I persevered. I vanquished the boggart of identity, I smiled through my heart center. I started to feel better.

But then it came to addressing the little matter of my feet. Doing so much yoga made my feet spread out (which I consider a good thing); I turned 30 and immediately inherited a protobunion (obviously: a bad and disgusting thing). Shoes were either too long, to the trippable point, or too narrow. I started searching around on the internet, and found a lot of moralizing advice about “stop deluding yourself” and “you can’t wear stilettos every day!” which made me more and more angry the more I researched and the less I was able to find, and the more these orthopedists were telling me this was my own fault. As it happens, I basically wear sneakers every day, but I wasn’t just annoyed at the Sex and the City assumptions. I was thinking about how many people are probably unable to find comfortable shoes and are hearing this same crap. Here I am, this little person with little wide feet, and I can’t find shoes that fit me right*—what about bigger people with bigger feet and furthermore with bigger orthopedic issues? Scrolling through Zappos’s plus-size selections, wave after wave of fuglitude breaks my heart. It’s like there’s no market for reality. In a country with whatever percent obesity, it can’t be that everybody under ninety has narrow feet.

I inherited my grandmother’s feet, and when I visited her two weeks ago, dealing with spinal stenosis and frequent, horrible nerve pain down her right leg, she was still fixated on her lifelong quest for comfortable shoes. I even wonder about the possible link, since all her problems are on her right side, between a lifetime squeezing her right foot into slightly too-narrow shoes and the damage and misalignment of her lower right lumbar vertebrae. It makes me want to scream.

And, yes, ok, I’m holding out on you, and so is my grandmother. For now, I’m ruling out shoes that we hate, such as birkenstocks or the other unmentionables I’ve written about before. Shoes in the realm of maybe include Dansko clogs. Shoes in the probably department include New Balances, which are apparently the only sneakers in the world now to come in multiple widths. Suggestions are welcome.

Oh. And, also, here's this.




(Post a new comment)


[info]lovelikeyeast
2008-02-07 09:36 pm UTC (link)
Keens. Keens keens keens keens keens.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nuncstans
2008-02-07 10:16 pm UTC (link)
Thanks for the suggestion. I am immediately scared of Keens because they define themselves as a hybrid. I am irrationally ill-disposed toward shoe hybrids (I believe I've insulted the sneadle in the past) because they seems to go along with an unnecessarily safari way of interfacing with the world, as though it is the ONE SHOE to fight lions, disperse/kill waterbugs, wade through slushy streets, ford rivers, ventilate while baking in the sun and warm while freezing int the snow. I want _less_ from a pair of shoes.

But I will consider the idea, nonetheless.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]lovelikeyeast
2008-02-07 10:24 pm UTC (link)
Wow, I had no idea they were hybrids. I do feel like I have more comfort and energy walking in them. All this time I've been fueled by a hybrid power source. Who knew?

Mostly, though, they run wide, are super comfy and supportive (but not painful to those of us who are more flat-footed and don't have a high arch) and have a wide, curvy aesthetic that I think looks great (not all shoe designers pull this off).

That said: I think their sandals are hideous. But the bowlingish-style walking shoes are excellent, look cute, and are so much more comfortable and supportive than any sneaker I've found that I do wear it for athletic purposes. So it doesn't look like a sneaker, and in fact, I have gotten stares at the rec center and snide remarks from my snobby sister for wearing street shoes to work out in, but here you go, it works as a hybrid.

I have yet to try the various mary-jane styles, but find myself desperate for shoes that can be worn with skirts and no socks, so may break down and try them this summer.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]snarkophone
2008-02-07 09:44 pm UTC (link)
red wing boots and asics sneakers. i also have wide feet and both of these have worked for me in the past. asics come in wide widths. they are perhaps not as aesthetically pleasing as other shoes but are IN NO WAY as fug as crocs.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nuncstans
2008-02-07 10:18 pm UTC (link)
Thanks. I actually love asics, so that will work, although I've just spent half an hour fruitlessly searching for the ones I liked in my size. Sigh. I'll also check out the boots end of things.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]pomo_drunkard
2008-02-07 10:14 pm UTC (link)
I've got nothing constructive vis a vis an answer to your problem, but I sympathize. My feet are different sizes, which means that any shoe I fine is probably going to be just right for one foot, and too big/small for the other. It sucks.

I'm also wondering...you had an * there. Is there a footnote that no longer exists? Is there a director's cut version of this post available only for subscribers?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nuncstans
2008-02-07 10:19 pm UTC (link)
Oh. The last paragraph was going to be a footnote and then I just left it lazily as a somewhat-coherent conclusion. I guess now I'll leave the asterisk there so this comment makes sense.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]lovelikeyeast
2008-02-07 10:26 pm UTC (link)
Oh, also, should you want to expand into a different genre of shoe and like cowboy boots, I cannot tell you how comfortable Ariat boots are. Some designs are adorable, some fugly, but they are rounded-toe, extremely supportive, well-made, and not outrageously expensive. They are my 2nd favorite walking shoe, behind the Keens.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nuncstans
2008-02-08 09:07 pm UTC (link)
thanks for the tips

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]alsoname
2008-02-07 10:28 pm UTC (link)
Custom-made shoes?? No idea how incredibly expensive that would be, though.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nuncstans
2008-02-08 09:08 pm UTC (link)
YES. this is the answer for me. It will be like $2,000 and I will convince myself it will be the only thing that will TRULY work, and after much anxiety and aggressive internet searching, I will give up. UNLESS...I make friends with a whimsical hippie cobbler and come up with a really good trade!!!

Excited now.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]constintina
2008-02-08 04:28 pm UTC (link)
I'm sorry. I got nothing. But it's nice to see you on LJ!

(Reply to this)


[info]rubychard
2008-02-08 06:50 pm UTC (link)
i have small wide feet, though no bunions (but a family history, so i should prepare myself...), and i like earth shoes. or at least, the one pair of them i have: comfortable, and cute, also. they're at: http://www.zappos.com/n/p/p/7301724.html

also, i find danskos very comfortable, though i agree they are usually aesthetically lacking.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nuncstans
2008-02-08 09:10 pm UTC (link)
thanks for the suggestion. I wouldn't have guessed that those were earth shoes. I just don't know if I can be someone wearing clogs.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]rubychard
2008-02-08 10:24 pm UTC (link)
i know what you mean; dansko does have some shoes that aren't particularly cloglike, though, so you could look into those...

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jwitchbaby
2008-02-10 07:43 am UTC (link)
dansko mary janes! comfortable and NOT clogs!

i, too, am anti-clog. i'm just the sort who would blithely and accidently kick them across the room on a regular basis.

this entry, by the way, was hilarious, especially "tenants".

(Reply to this)

"where do babies come from?"
[info]mjmj
2008-03-03 06:20 pm UTC (link)
modern version: "kids find it mysterious, too"

(Reply to this)

(Reply from suspended user)

[info]milosh
2008-05-27 06:27 pm UTC (link)
claire! it's me, myles. i never post, and neither do you, but we should be lj friends, nevertheless.

also, my ex has a tattoo of our dog + grimlock, so i was psyched to see your userpic. i'll see if i can find a photo for you.

so good to see you this past week. hope to see more of you soon.

(Reply to this)


[info]yes_yet_bet
2008-09-06 01:56 am UTC (link)
Finn Comfort. The styles are pleasantly odd. The cost is a bit high, say 200-400. But you should try a pair on.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…