The Nature Theater of Oklahoma ([info]nuncstans) wrote,
@ 2007-11-06 10:35:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current location:my office
Current mood: striking
Entry tags:bib fortuna, hollywood, jabba de hut, tv, writers' strike

Some Notes about this Writers’ Strike
I am unable to follow what is actually happening in the Hollywood Writers’ Strike, if in fact that is actually addressed in any news source. Perhaps there is only, in fact, the same inane story angle everywhere, which appears to be the attempt to assuage the nightmares of vulnerable, frightened masses of TV zombies with the fact that shitty TV scripts are piled up infinitatata. Don’t Panic seems to be the main point of every article. There may —MAY— be a terrorist attack by pinko Hollywood writers but they can NEVER TAKE YOUR FREEDOM TO WATCH TV AWAY FROM YOU. THE GOOD STUDIO EXECS AND PRODUCER DEMIURGES ARE THE ONLY ONES WITH THAT POWER and they would NEVER, NEVER DO THAT BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT COMMIE JEWS.

I cannot take anything in Hollywood seriously, ever. I realize that this is a huge, cultural wasteland-shaped blind spot of mine. Certainly I know what Hollywood writers and even actors suffered in the past —remember when actors were differently-abled humans rather than limited humanoid protocol droids? Between the Hays Code and the HUAC and passing through twenty kinds of hell in the middle, you can sort of understand how Never-Never Land became a factory for the unimpeachable dreck it’s been churning out, with few exceptions, every season, for the last infinity years.

Obviously if there are two sides to this, I sympathize with the writers. But it's hard to care about such bad writing. They're probably good people, stuck in a hellish eternal boardroom of the soul, churning out Everybody Loves Raymond jokes and diagramming funnies in response to the increasingly passive tickle-me American audience. But other than a brief twinge of real sympathy for the writers of 30 Rock, who actually do a good show, I'm mostly just confused and overwhelmed by the unbelievable stupidity of how the Strike is being talked about, and what this appears to tell me about my culture.

For example:

1. The fact that the newswriters’ “sympathy” is inevitably with the multibillionaire bosses rather than with their colleagues in Hollywoodland. You’ve got to love the results of media consolidation on this one. Look at the logical possibilities here: either media consolidation has effectively proved that all major news outlets successfully present “neutrality” as sympathy with ginormous media bosses, or all journalists are now self-selecting milk monitors who enjoy trash talking their equals because they feel it makes them bigger to identify with The Man. LOOK AT THIS: “Some [execs] are kicking off the tension with soccer, like Sony Pictures Classics exec Dylan Leiner, who's a 10-year vet of the Europe vs. World United AFM game held last Saturday. His company gets through AFM by strategically targeting projects -- focusing on two this year -- instead of looking through a ton of product. "There's a sense of anxiety here because films aren't selling for what they have in the past or working the same way they have," he said.” (Hollywood Reporter)

2. On that note, the notion that the audience will be “left in the lurch” by the strike. Obviously, this is not only completely dishonest but just patently self-deceptive, this idea that rolling jabba-the-hut studio execs and producers are concerned about all of us.
Jabba to Bib Fortuna: I will eat each and every television audience member until I am as big as the whole universe, which will be inside me. It will be the Jabbaverse, and I will be its fractal king and lord.
Bib Fortuna: [whispering] But… Jabba, Sir, the writers are going on strike. The audience members will stop watching. Corporate sponsors will pay less for repeats and reality shows.
Jabba: [frowns] We don’t want audience be bored! We want audience be happy in Jabbaverse! Thaw new writer out of carbonite. Make slave girl write. I concerned about audience now. Must not leave audience in lurch.

And, within the absolutely ridiculous concern for the public/strike alert-level orange outlook:

3. The absolutely awesome emphasis on children. Because we all know how American children don’t have enough access to television, and that it’s crucial for their well-being that they watch more. “Upon being told that the strike's outcome would determine whether new televisions shows would be able to get on the air, one child looked up with a worried expression and said simply, "Oh." (Hollywood Reporter) I am so worried about how children will deal with this strike, and in fact I think that we should focus on their opinions about it because they are probably the best prepared for understanding how strikes work, what their purpose and history is in American politics, just to make sure that our news coverage remains on point.




(Post a new comment)


[info]pomo_drunkard
2007-11-06 04:23 pm UTC (link)
It's hard not to sympathize with the writers, since their basic point is: "When you get paid for the work we do, we would like to get paid as well."

And the studios' response to that is a collective, "Hmmmm, no, that doesn't work for us. Let us study ways in which we can pay you less, okay?"

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]franzeska
2007-11-06 04:45 pm UTC (link)
With a nice side helping of "But we're not making any money off of New Media, so we need a contract that gives you 0% of $0 instead of 3% of $0". The whole thing is just embarrassing.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

I hate myself
[info]nuncstans
2007-11-06 10:03 pm UTC (link)
See, you guys apparently understand what the writers' strike is actually about. My eyes just glaze over, and then I spend the time it would have taken to learn something and probably also get some work done to write about how I feel about not knowing it. In my defense against myself, I have a fever and I hate working.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: I hate myself
[info]franzeska
2007-11-06 10:40 pm UTC (link)
Heh. Well, assuming you're actually confused about what's going on and not just kidding (or for anyone else just hearing about all this)...

As I understand it, it's actually pretty simple. It's just that the studios don't want to explain the fact that they're horribly greedy in terms that the public can understand.

In essence, a couple of decades ago, the writers negotiated an ok rate for syndication residuals and a very bad rate for video tapes. I assume they thought that this would be a sensible compromise since no one knew whether videos would make a lot of money. Then VCRs became a staple of American homes and the writers gnashed their teeth at being deprived of income. The bad video rate was later applied to DVDs.

Recently, tv shows have started to be shown online as a "promotion" (but notice that we're talking about full episodes with commercials and everything), sold on iTunes, shown on cellphones, etc. This business is small at present when compared to normal tv viewing, but the writers aren't getting paid at all for any of this.

The writers would like to raise the DVD rate. They would also like to use the syndication rate for online formats instead of the much lower DVD rate. At the last minute, they offered some kind of compromise on the former but not on the latter. The networks/studios refuse to budge on either.

The studios claim that they can't pay residuals for the online stuff because it is "for promotion" and no one knows whether New Media will make money in the future. Looking at the VHS/DVD example, I think we can see why this argument was not effective with the writers.

The networks/studios, aside from being scum-sucking greedy bastards, are also worried about a couple of real issues: Network television lost 9-10% of its audience share in the 1988 strike, and viewership has been declining since then. (No, people aren't doing more worthwhile things: they're watching cable.) Lower overall numbers combined with Tivo viewing and a change in Nielsen ratings methods that can show who is actually watching during each commercial have sharply decreased advertising revenue. In addition, the other unions will be renegotiating this summer, so whatever the writers get now, the actors will want later.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: I hate myself
[info]nuncstans
2007-11-07 03:47 pm UTC (link)
That was very helpful! Thanks!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

I hate myself
(Anonymous)
2007-11-06 10:04 pm UTC (link)
See, you guys apparently understand what the writers' strike is actually about. My eyes just glaze over, and then I spend the time it would have taken to learn something and probably also get some work done to write about how I feel about not knowing it. In my defense against myself, I have a fever and I hate working.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]commonreader
2007-11-06 04:36 pm UTC (link)
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT COMMIE JEWS.

Since when?

(Reply to this)


[info]messy_hair_girl
2007-11-06 06:11 pm UTC (link)
This morning I heard someone say that industry experts were all excited to see what viewing outlets people will turn to if all of television turns into re-runs. How dumb is that? I will tell them what we'll turn to -- Netflix, PBS and cool on-line stuff. This is exactly what giant piles of us are doing already now that "Two and a Half Men" is allegedly the number one comedy.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]pomo_drunkard
2007-11-06 07:24 pm UTC (link)
I, for one, have been experimenting with books and the outdoors.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]messy_hair_girl
2007-11-06 11:34 pm UTC (link)
Books! That's dangerous. It's like playing with matches. You might have ideas!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]constintina
2007-11-07 05:06 pm UTC (link)
Don't you read Entertainment Weekly? Didn;t they explain it?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nuncstans
2007-11-07 05:35 pm UTC (link)
Yes! But seriously, I'm just dumb about this kind of thing. My eyes glaze over and my eyes keep reading but my brain starts thinking about where to eat. I can't even follow my own union's negotiations. I've been a union organizer and I can't process the details of these things; they bored me to tears. I'm only good at singing "This little light of mine" and marching in a circle, pointing out the flaws in institutional logic via dramatic historical analogies, and coming up with (to me) interesting ideas that always get vetoed, because today's agenda is the 3.4% increase versus the flat increase at two out of three campuses that will catch the sciences up over zzzzzzzz.......

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]constintina
2007-11-07 07:37 pm UTC (link)
But union negotiations are more interesting when they're about movies and the internet.

This is so funny because I was just wanking about how I felt like "public opinion" and "media" were more sympathetic to the writers this time around than they were to SAG like, a bunch of years ago, when they almost struck (striked?) over almost the same issues. As I recall, the core was royalties and downloading movies/TV shows and same thing, but it was like oh boo hoo, brad pitt wants more money in THE FUTUREZ when we DOWNLOAD tv wtf...it was alot more abstract then. Networks didn't stream shows, iTunes didn;t have TV and movies, pretty much the only tv/film downloading going on was serious nerds file sharing and whatnot...it was HARD to get a watchable movie on the internets. Also people think "actors" = people getting paid millions a movie, and obviously that's a tiny percentage. So people were resentful, and media stoked this with the same "what about that Michael Bay movie you were looking forward to? What about Friends? HOW WILL YOU SURVIVE?" panic mongering.

I felt like it was a little more balanced this time around, but then again, my sample is very selective. I haven't been following it on the news or in the tabloid papers, apart from an episode of ABC World News I had to write up for work. They're report was schizo. It seemed sympathetic to the writers but then threw in this weird benevolent grand-patriarch depiction of "corporate powers" who were "stocking up" on entertainmentz 4 u. I guess that's "balance"??


ANYWAY.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]nuncstans
2007-11-07 08:20 pm UTC (link)
Well I just keep reading the stories about it that come up in my headline news feed for the bbc and nyt and they all seem pretty scare-mongery, but then again maybe that's the only part that grabs my easily-fluctuating attention.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]constintina
2007-11-07 08:23 pm UTC (link)
fluctuate this.

I dunno.

When are you coming to NY again? Lotsa room in my new apartment...

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…